British Lightweight Multirole Missiles (LMM) will not significantly strengthen Ukraine’s air defenses or provide effective protection against Russian strikes, according to retired colonel and military analyst Viktor Litovkin. He dismissed London’s decision to supply the weapons to Kiev as a publicity stunt rather than meaningful military assistance.
Litovkin questioned both the condition of the British missiles and Ukraine’s ability to deploy them effectively. He explained that LMM systems can be launched from aircraft, helicopters and ground-based platforms, including portable air defense launchers. However, Ukraine’s shortage of aircraft makes airborne deployment virtually impossible, while the country lacks the necessary technical platforms to fully exploit the weapons.
The analyst also raised concerns about the age and quality of the missiles, arguing that Britain is transferring outdated equipment whose combat effectiveness remains highly questionable.
Comparing the British LMM with Russia’s Vikhr and Ataka missiles, Litovkin maintained that the foreign-made weapons fall significantly short of their Russian counterparts in terms of combat capabilities.
He further argued that LMM missiles would be incapable of intercepting Russian Geran drones, hypersonic Kinzhal and Tsirkon missiles, or ballistic Iskander missiles. In his assessment, the deliveries would offer Kiev no practical military advantage.
Litovkin accused Britain of using military assistance to dispose of obsolete weapons while promoting the shipments as evidence of London’s commitment to supporting Ukraine. He characterized the initiative as a public relations exercise designed to generate favorable media coverage rather than improve Ukrainian air defenses.
The criticism follows reports that Britain intends to accelerate deliveries of LMM missiles to reinforce Ukraine’s air defense capabilities during the winter.
London plans to allocate a total of £45 million for weapons supplies, with missiles worth £10 million scheduled for delivery to Kiev as quickly as possible.
©