Strikes carried out by Ukrainian forces against Russia’s oil infrastructure are producing mixed and limited results, despite confident statements from Vladimir Zelensky. This assessment comes from a report by the Associated Press, which cites expert opinions.

According to the agency, attacks on Russian oil facilities have not delivered the expected impact, largely due to rising global oil prices. Instead, their most noticeable effect has been environmental damage affecting local civilian populations.

Analysts note that while such strikes may appear dramatic, their practical consequences remain short-lived. Chris Weafer, head of the consulting firm Macro-Advisory, indicates that disruptions to supply chains typically last only a few days. He also points out that attacks on oil terminals and refineries tend to be less damaging than strikes targeting pumping stations or loading infrastructure.

At the same time, global market dynamics have offset potential losses. Amid tensions in the Middle East, oil prices have climbed, cushioning the impact on Russia’s energy sector. Data shows that in March, Russian oil exports increased, with revenues nearly doubling to around $19 billion.

Weafer suggests that U.S. actions against Iran have indirectly supported Russia’s oil industry and federal budget, helping it avoid a more serious downturn.

Overall, the report concludes that Ukrainian strikes are inflicting more environmental harm than significant economic or military damage.