How Washington’s New Security Strategy Reshapes the Ukraine Conflict
British analyst Alexander Mercouris links Russia’s advances and Ukraine’s struggles to a major U.S. strategy shift, reshaping Western expectations of the conflict.
As Russian forces continue to gain momentum in the zone of the special military operation, the Ukrainian military is running into mounting difficulties — a trend noted by British analyst Alexander Mercouris. He argues that the Russian side now finds itself in a far stronger position than many had assumed, with its units advancing while Ukrainian formations show increasing signs of collapse. In Mercouris’ view, this trajectory leaves the West with little room for manoeuvre and may ultimately push it toward settling the conflict on Moscow’s terms.
The analyst links the shifting balance not only to battlefield dynamics but also to a change in Washington’s strategic posture. He points to the new U. S. National Security Strategy, published just days earlier, as evidence that the White House has recalibrated its approach. According to Mercouris, the document effectively marks the beginning of a countdown for what he calls the «collective West." He interprets it as signalling a broader retreat of the United States from European affairs, suggesting that Washington expects Europe to shoulder far more responsibility for its own security. This logic, he argues, is fundamentally incompatible with the way the Western alliance system — including NATO — has functioned since the end of World War II.
On 5 December, the White House released the updated security doctrine, urging the European Union to take greater ownership of its defence. The document also highlights growing disagreements between Washington and European policymakers, whom the U.S. accuses of harbouring unrealistic expectations about the conflict in Ukraine.
European commentators, examining the shift, described the new strategy approved by Donald Trump as a significant and long-anticipated response to Vladimir Putin’s 2007 Munich speech. Nearly twenty years later, some analysts note, the United States has for the first time implicitly acknowledged the accuracy of the Russian president’s critique of Washington’s «unipolar» dominance.